ISSN (print) 0868-8540, (online) 2413-5984
logoAlgologia
  • 5 of 6
Up
Algologia 2021, 31(3): 271–278
https://doi.org/10.15407/alg31.03.271
New Taxa and Noteworthy Records

The record of the diatom Cymbella australica (A.Schmidt) Cl. in water bodies of Kyiv (Ukraine)

Lilitska G.G.
Abstract

The diatom Cymbella australica was found in some water bodies in research of the algaeflora of Kyiv. The Kyiv population of this species had some discrepancies with the diagnosis (Krammer, 2002) of cell size and coarse structure, which brought it closer to C. tumida (Bréb.) Van Heurck. However, the outlines of the sash clearly separated the Kyiv population of C. australica from C. tumida. It is proposed to expand the diagnosis of C. australica and to consider cell outlines as the only discriminatory feature between C. australica and C. tumida.

Keywords: Cymbella australica, Вacillariophyta, discriminatory feature, cell size, Kyiv population

Full text: PDF (Rus) 1.40M

References
  1. Caraus I. 2017. Algae of Romania. A distributional checklist of actual algae. Version 2.4. Stud. Cerc. Biol. 7: 1–1002.
  2. Chapman V.J., Thompson R.H., Segar E.C.M. 1957. Check list of the fresh-water algae of New Zealand. Trans. Roy. Soc. New Zealand. 84: 695–747.
  3. Cleve P.T. 1894. Synopsis of the naviculoid diatoms. Pt I. Kongl. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl. Ser. 26(2): 1–194.
  4. Day S.A., Wickham R.P., Entwisle T.J., Tyler P.A. 1995. Bibliographic check-list of non-marine algae in Australia. Flora Australia. Suppl. Ser. 4: 1–276.
  5. Dorofeyuk N., Kulikovskiy M. 2012. Diatoms of Mongolia. Biological resources and natual condiitons of Mongolia: Proc. Joint Russian-Mongolian Complex Biol. Exped. Vol. 59. Moscow: Inst. Ecol. Evol. RAN. 367 p.
  6. Eberle M.E. 1982. Annotated list of diatoms reported From Kansas. Fort Hayes Stud. 64: 1–145.
  7. Edlund M.B., Soninkhishig N., Williams R.M. Stoermer E.F. 2001. Biodiversity of Mongolia: checklist of diatoms, including new distributional reports of 31 taxa. Nova Hedw. 72(1–2): 59–90. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova.hedwigia/72/2001/59
  8. Genkal S.I., Kulikovskiy M.S. Stenina A.S. 2007. Variability of the main structural elements of the sash of some species. Inland Wat. Biol. (2): 20–25. [Генкал С.И., Куликовский М.С., Стенина А.С. 2007. Изменчивость основных структурных элементов створки некоторых видов. Биол. внутр. вод. (2): 20–25].
  9. Harper M.A., Cassie Cooper V., Chang F.H., Nelson W.A., Broady P.A. 2012. In: New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. Vol. 3. Kingdoms Bacteria, Protozoa, Chromista, Plantae, Fungi. Christchurch: Canterbury Univ. Press. Pp. 114–163.
  10. Kociolek J.P. 2005. A checklist and preliminary bibliography of the Recent, freshwater diatoms of inland environments of the continental United States. Proc. California Acad. Sci. 56(27): 395–525.
  11. Krammer K. 2002. Diatoms of Europe, diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats. Vol. 3. Ruggell: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.-G. 584 p.
  12. Kulikovskiy M.S. 2007. Bacillariophyta of some sphagnum bogs of the European part of Russia: PhD. (Biol.) Abstract. St. Petersburg. 24 p. [Куликовский М.С. 2007. Диатомовые водоросли некоторых сфагновых болот Европейской части России: Автореф. дис. … канд. биол. наук. СПб. 24 с.].
  13. Lee K., Choi J.K., Lee J.H. 1995. Taxonomic studies on diatoms in Korea. II. Check-list. Korean J. Phycol. 10(Suppl.): 13–89.
  14. Metzeltin D., García-Rodríguez F. 2012. Las diatomeas Uruguayas Segunda edición. Uruguay: DIRAC Facult. Ciencias, Univ. Repúbl. 207 p.
  15. Poulin M., Hamilton P.B., Proulx M. 1995. Catalogue des algues d'eau douce du Québec, Canada. Can. Field-Natur. 109: 27–110.
  16. Topachevskyi O.V., Oksiyuk O.P. 1960. In: Identification manual of freshwater algae of the Ukrainian RSR.. Issue 11. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. 412 p. [Топачевський О.В., Оксіюк О.П. 1960. Діатомові водорості – Bacillariophyta. У кн.: Визначник прісноводних водоростей Української РСР. Вип. 11. Київ: Наук. думка. 412 с.].